'The most important moral, ethical, spiritual and political issue humankind has ever faced'

Terrorism? War? Obviously it's not these. Bush might say so, but my president, the one who deserves to be in the White House because more Americans actually voted for him, says the truth and stands up against the corporate media, with all its anti-Gore and anti-Earth bias:

A 10-year University of California study found that essentially zero percent of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles disagreed that global warming exists, whereas, another study found that 53 percent of mainstream newspaper articles disagreed the global warming premise.

He noted that recently the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its fourth unanimous report calling on world leaders to take action on global warming.

"I believe that is one of the principal reasons why political leaders around the world have not yet taken action," Gore said. "There are many reasons, but one of the principal reasons in my view is more than half of the mainstream media have rejected the scientific consensus implicitly — and I say 'rejected,' perhaps it's the wrong word. They have failed to report that it is the consensus and instead have chosen … balance as bias.

"I don't think that any of the editors or reporters responsible for one of these stories saying, 'It may be real, it may not be real,' is unethical. But I think they made the wrong choice, and I think the consequences are severe.

"I think if it is important to look at the pressures that made it more likely than not that mainstream journalists in the United States would convey a wholly inaccurate conclusion about the most important moral, ethical, spiritual and political issue humankind has ever faced."

There you have it, clear as day. Not a single real scientist doubts the Inconvenient Truth of global warming caused by human greed. But the big media are always lying by putting "balance" ahead of human need. And so we get the bias view that global warming may or not be real.

This is a travesty of journalistic justice. Who benefits from a burning up earth and no response from Bush's America to the disaster? Well, big media loves to sell papers. I just wish they realized when the earth burns, they'll have plenty of papers to sell, but no one left to sell them to. But they don't care, they'll just be counting their money.

This really is the biggest issue facing us all, for what is social justice, equality, peace and eco sustainability if the whole earth melts? Nothing, that's what.